| | OCTOBER 2023MANAGEHRMAGAZINE.COM9developing the sophistication and diversification of its asset allocation. So, what's holding schemes back?Legacy issuesWhen speaking to schemes trustees about why the barriers to investing in private markets, the need for liquidity is often expressed as one of the key concerns, along with the higher costs of these asset classes.There is a fundamental liquidity mismatch at the heart of UK's DC schemes. These pension pots will accumulate wealth for workers over many decades, yet many schemes use platforms which have daily dealing requirements.While these daily dealing requirements are more of a legacy issue than a deliberate design feature, they have stymied the size of the asset universe used by such schemes. Arguably a DC pension represents one of the longest investment durations available, the individual can be investing in their pension over a 60 year plus period, through accumulation and then decumulation. Therefore, why the need for daily dealing? A scheme will need to ensure it can meet short-term redemptions but given the positive cash flows received on a daily basis from contributions this need can be managed. Just as I explained in a previous blog there are good reasons for the higher costs of private equity, this blog highlights why liquidity concerns should not hold back DC schemes from investing in private assets.Meeting liquidity needsWhile many DC schemes have not invested in private markets funds, some have allocated to this asset class while also meeting the liquidity needs of their member.The recent Productive Finance Working Group (PFWG) report concluded a broader range of DC schemes could find their way of replicating this.As highlighted above trustees can invest in private markets in the default fund by understanding its future cashflows. As these are likely to be strong and predictable for the future, this should provide decision makers with comfort.If trustees determine their risk appetite for private market assets, then carry out scenario analysis and stress testing of liquidity events this should provide further comfort, says the report from the PFWG.Liquidity at fund levelDecision makers will also need to work with fund managers to understand the liquidity of the underlying investments as well as the structure of the underlying fund itself, adds the PFWG report.This includes considering the impact of different fund structures on the ability of the scheme to access liquidity and the range of liquidity tools used by managers. When open-ended funds are used, fund managers will need to set a minimum notice period in a way that ensures alignment with their ability to manage the fund, i.e., 3 months under the Long-Term Asset Fund (`LTAF') product structure.So, in some respects it's a similar issue to cost, in that now feels the right time to take a step back from the existing operational model and ask some serious questions on why certain aspects, such as daily pricing are necessary within a system that now has little need for these constraints and one that is seeking to enhance member outcomes. These assets also have the potential to access inflation-linked cash flows to offer members some purchasing power protection. At the moment DB schemes have access to these benefits while many DC schemes do not
< Page 8 | Page 10 >